Jump to content

Mischling x tiger outcomes


Recommended Posts

Wat... no photos...

Likely story :p

Seriously though ninja did u know what f generation they were...?

Honcho,

I have been breeding Michlings for years so god knows how many F's they were.

The only straight CBS and CRS I've got now are the April sale 10 PRL CRS culls and the 5 PBL culls from Dean. So starting afresh with them now again as I now have more tanks.

When Marcus comes down again, I will get him to take pics for me. OK, trust me, I'm a fishermans wife!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ninja

    15

  • smicko

    14

  • CNgo2006

    10

  • KiwiBigD

    9

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Im sure ninja knows about red wines but she specifically said red pandas...hence LIAR LIAR pants on FIRE!

I happen to like calling Wine Red, Red Panda, cause that's what they are, really, don't you agree????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People say it doesn't happen, but theoretically it is possible, so i believe you ninja :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
I recently had a Michling x Michling produce 2 black pandas and 2 red pandas. It was OMG when I saw them and you will just ave to believe me.

all well and good.. but they wont breed true will they? aren't they more likely just to produce mish offspring as they are not a true TB?

even if u use these 'red' and black pandas and crossed them with a true TB it would still produce mish yeah?

mish x mish might produce the odd 'TB'.. but that 'TB' isnt really a full blooded TB right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great thought process, shrimpstan, and you're absolutely right. If a person buys a TB, from a TB x Mish parents, then TB x TB, will/may produce TB/Mish offsprings, whereas, TB x TB from F2/3+ generation will breed TRUE TB's, BUT another tangent of KK x KK = 100% KK off-springs Vs a mix of KK, WR & BB....etc so when buying TB's, ask the breeder, where it's heritage were derived from. I suspect most hobbyist wouldn't mind if the off-springs were KK, WR or BB, but if 50% plus were mishlings, then they maybe disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are TB's recessive? Come on all you experts out there?

I repeat the above, are TB's reccessive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all well and good.. but they wont breed true will they? aren't they more likely just to produce mish offspring as they are not a true TB?

even if u use these 'red' and black pandas and crossed them with a true TB it would still produce mish yeah?

mish x mish might produce the odd 'TB'.. but that 'TB' isnt really a full blooded TB right?

Shrimpstan, it depends on wether the TB is double recessive or not. If it is double recessive, then crossed with another double recessive it has to produce all TB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just found this thread, I still have so much to learn lol. I recently got 6 mish of bb to see if I up to the tb level without dropping a heap of coin if something goes wrong. Being f3 mish if they breed together will the offspring be f3 or do I need to add a tb to keep them at that level? Also if I get extremely lucky and they breed for instance a male and female kk will breeding them together produce true kk or f4 mish with a percentage of kk?

Cheers mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

:cower: I went into shrimp keeping for fun:dejection: My brain cells are hurting:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops I just asked the same question as shrimpstan in a different way lol.

Cheers mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:cower: I went into shrimp keeping for fun:dejection: My brain cells are hurting:confused:

Your not alone ineke, my head hurts trying to understand as well lol

Cheers mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if anyone knows whether TB's are from a recessive gene, it would be much easier to forecast?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Is it worth asking the question on a European site? Would they have any more knowledge and would they share? Perhaps Imke /shrimpsider could help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ninja. If you got pandas from mish, i would think it would be a recessive gene, much like albino. Now I only take that from breeding albino bristlenose. If two common bn throw albino thats recessive, if you breed the two albino together you get 100% albino thats double recessive. So if it works for fish it should be the same for shrimp.

Cheers mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TB genes are recessive, thus F generations affect the probability/outcome. Having F x F, dilutes the TB genes, so each F generation will need to be X back to a TB, to improve the recessiveness/genetic TB "carrier". F1 x F1 does NOT equate to F2...ONLY TB x F1 = F2, TB x F2 =F3...etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if fxf dilutes the genes would f3xf3 result in f2 as their is less likelyhood of producing tb?

Sorry bb but I want to be sure lol.

Cheers mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all theoretical but:

F1xF1 definitely would not improve your chances of getting TB's from successive crosses (decreases it in fact) but, if you do get a TB from a f1xf1 and the TB gene is indeed recessive, breeding it with another f1xf1 TB should give you a pure TB and the babies from that with a TB would be pure TB's also.

If it doesn't then the simple genetics model doesn't fit, which happens.

Then there are all kinds of things to consider like sex linked genes (as in females have a higher carrying 'x' gene (as in example) than males).

Get a geneticist on the case and you'll know in 10 years :p

F1xF1 has according to simple genetic models a 50% chance of getting back a F1 mischling, 25% chance of TB and a 25% chance of CRS/CBS. Any deviations from this suggest that there are other factors at work. The 25% chance of a CRS/CBS is the reason that F1xF1 isn't as good as a F1 mischling, because you could get the crystal back and not even know, then you cross that crystal with a F1 and you very quickly lose the TB genes.

Also, crossing a F1 with a TB should have a 50/50 chance of TB's and a 50/50 chance of getting back a F1, according to the simple genetics models, F1 and F2 shouldn't be different. Again, these models are often poor fits for many species.

Just food for thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just found this thread' date=' I still have so much to learn lol. I recently got 6 mish of bb to see if I up to the tb level without dropping a heap of coin if something goes wrong. Being f3 mish if they breed together will the offspring be f3 or do I need to add a tb to keep them at that level? Also if I get extremely lucky and they breed for instance a male and female kk will breeding them together produce true kk or f4 mish with a percentage of kk?

Cheers mick[/quote']

When I first started I had trouble keeping female TB's alive. Now I have RO water and chillers its different!

if you want my advice, buy female Michlings and a male TB. (much cheaper way to go) The Michling females are stronger and depending on their parentage will produce TB's for you. The resulting TB's will be much healthier and then you can keep crossing these together to improve your percentages of TB's. This is going to involve more than one tank. The phenotype TB's go into a separate tank as soon as they are old enough to start on your pure TB line. Any Michlings they produce go back into the first tank as long as they are female.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 2 WR from Michling x Michling if they are a pair, I could breed them down the track to see what they produce. I don't really want to have a separate tank just for that if its already been done. Anyone done it???? ?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

G'Day Mick, F3 x F3 is a dilution BUt not neccessarily equate to F2. As TB's a recessive genes, it's Hit/Miss...

IMO & Understanding ...

AA = TB

Aa = Mishling

aa = No TB genes (CRS/CBS/SW/GB)

AA x aa = 100% Aa (i.e. F1 Mishling)

Aa x Aa = Aa & aa (i.e. Dilution and due to recessive genes, it's a hit/miss with "aa" not carrying the TB genetics

AA x Aa = (?)% Aa and (?)% AA (Depends of the F generation, and TB genetics, i.e. is the TB from AA x Aa (i.e. TB x Mish)

AA x AA = 100 (?) % AA (Depends on the TB genetics, i.e. is the TB from AA x Aa (i.e. TB x Mish), and F? for the Mishling

aa x Aa = (?)% aa & (?)% Aa (i.e. Dilution and due to recessive genes, it's a hit/miss with "aa" not carrying the TB genetics

Now, I've got a headache ! LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all need a panadol the size of a bus lol. Thanks for that bb

Or as the wife says "it's a shrimp it breed shrimp" lol

Cheers mick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • ngoomie
      Alright, I've done a bit more research on gentian violet's cancer-causing potential but I haven't yet done research on malachite green's to compare. But from reading the California propositon 65 document about GV (North Americans incl. some Canadians will recognize this as the law that causes some products they buy to be labelled with "known to the state of California to cause cancer", including the exact product I bought) it seems that the risk of cancer is related to internal use, either injection or ingestion. Speaking of ingestion, I think GV bans mainly relate to its use in treating fish/shrimp/etc. which are intended for human consumption, because of the above. And in countries where GV isn't banned for this purpose, it does seem to get used on various species of shrimp without causing any issue for the shrimp themselves (at least enough so for shrimp farming purposes). See the following: In February, the FDA Began Rejecting Imported Shrimp for Gentian Violet and Chloramphenicol (2022 article by Southern Shrimp Alliance) FDA Starts New Calendar Year by Refusing Antibiotic-Contaminated Shrimp from Three BAP-Certified Indian Processors and Adding a BAP-Certified Vietnamese Processor to Import Alert (2024 article by Southern Shrimp Alliance) Southern Shrimp Alliance and some other organizations have tons of other articles in this vein, but I'd be here for a while and would end up writing an absolutely massive post if I were to link every instance I found of articles mentioning shrimp shipments with gentian violet and/or leucogentian violet registering as contaminants. That being said, I know shrimp farmed for consumption and dwarf shrimp are often somewhat distantly related (in fact, the one time a shrimp's species name is listed that I can see, it's the prawn sp. Macrobrachium rosenbergii, who at best occupies the same infraorder as Neocaridina davidi but nothing nearer), but this at least gives a slightly better way of guessing whether it will be safe for aquarium dwarf shrimp or not than my bladder snail anecdote from the OP.
    • sdlTBfanUK
      I would hazard a guess that perhaps those eggs were unfertilized and thereby unviable? Did the eggs change colour, usually yellow to grey as the yolks used up, or any eyes in the eggs. Is your water ok, using RO remineralised and the parameters in range, as I have heard others say that if the water isn't good it can 'force' a molt? How is it going overall, do you have a good size colony in the tank, you may have reached 'maximum occupancy' as a tank can only support so many occupants.
    • beanbag
      Hello folks,  The current problem I am having is that my Taiwan bee shrimp are molting before all their eggs have hatched.  Often the shrimp keep the eggs for 40+ days.  During that time, they lose about half or so, either due to dropping or duds or whatever.  Shortly before molting they look to have about a dozen left, and then they molt with about half a dozen eggs still on the shell.  Then the other shirmp will come and eat the shell.  These last few times, I have been getting around 0-3 surviving babies per batch.  I figure I can make the eggs hatch faster by raising the water temperature more (currently around 68F, which is already a few degrees higher than I used to keep it) or make the shrimp grow slower by feeding them less (protein).  Currently I feed Shrimp King complete every other day, and also a small dab of Shrimp Fit alternating days.  Maybe I can start alternating with more vegetable food like mulberry?  or just decrease the amount of food?
    • ngoomie
      Yeah, cancer risk was a thing I'd seen mentioned a lot when looking into gentian violet briefly. I kinda just figured it might only be as bad as the cancer risk of malachite green as well, but maybe I should look into it more. I've been doing a pretty good job of not getting it on my skin and also avoiding dunking my unprotected hands into the tank water while treating my fish at least, though. Maybe I'll just not use it once I'm done this course of medication anyways, because I know a store I can sometimes get to that's pretty distant carries both malachite green and methylene blue, and in pretty large quantities.
    • jayc
      Can't help you with Gentian Violet, sorry. It is banned in Australia violet for potential toxicity, and even possible cancer risks. I thought it was banned in Canada as well. At least, you now know why there isn't much info on gentian violet medication and it's use. But keep an eye on the snails after a week. If it affects the snails, it might not kill them immediately. So keep checking for up to a week. Much safer options out there. No point risking your own life over unsafe products.
×
×
  • Create New...