I don't really like having to make these corrections here - it feels confrontational, not what I want at all - but they need to be made. Misinformation is such a problem in this industry and/or hobby. "The research shows" that anaerobic bacteria convert NO2 to N2. They use the oxygen to drive their metabolism because it's not freely available in the anoxic conditions they require. The required conditions are quite specific and not always easily achieved. Normally a dedicated anaerobic module is incorporated into the filtration pathway, with the first stage of aerobic nitrifiers depleting the oxygen level sufficiently for the anaerobic denitrifiers to function as desired. The aeration systems you describe are widely used in sewage treatment, aquaculture and elsewhere to provide a suitable environment (oxygen-rich) for AEROBIC nitrification. This process is familiar to anyone who manages an aquatic environment. Consequently, with ample oxygen available in the water, plant roots are able to efficiently uptake the nitrate produced (and other nutrients, like phosphate); the net result is a reduction of free nitrate and other accumulated nutrients but the mechanism is completely different. And the nutrients aren't gone, they're locked up in plant biomass until it's removed. NH3 can be gassed off with violent aeration but the process isn't efficient until about pH 10, simply because too much ammonia occurs as NH4 below there. There is no argument that deep water aeration is a great thing. I'm sure you remember the Botulism crisis at Ringwood Lake a few years ago. There is no argument that stratified layers in the water column are normally undesirable. But does aeration promote anaerobic denitrification? No. Does it convert nitrate to N2 by some other mechanism and then expel it from the water? No.