Jump to content

Crossbreeding and cubing


BristledOne

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!In a recent topic (2014 price guide) I saw mention from squiggle about Phenotypes and Genotypes. I hope he doesn't mind me quoting him on this as I feel it's probably the best description I've read in a while

genotype(genetically pure) & phenotype(looking like but impure genetics)
This then started some talk about what counts as pure? and how some genetics skip generations. It got my mind-a-jogging and so below I'd like to write up some of my thoughts on genetic purity and the explanation of these skipping genetics and how they come to be. I'd really appreciate everyone's input, as we all know I'm only new to shrimp keeping but I have been searching into these things before when trying to figure out how line bred guppies came to be and more recently I did the maths to figure out plans for my longfin Bristlenose projects."Cubing" and line breedingThe principal should be able to apply to any sort of genetics, fish, birds, dogs and...people 0_0But pretty much it's just keeping the mother or father, breeding it with a suitable mate then crossing back the children with the parent you most want them to match. So for shrimp we tend to accept you keep the male as it can be bred to more shrimp in a shorter period of time, but you can technically do it by keeping a chosen female and crossing her back with her male young but you will get less offspring in a given space of time and those offspring all have a chance of expressing slightly different phenotypes. So the more phenotypes we can choose from the greater chance we have of selecting and strengthening desired traits along the way. This is how traits such as longer or unusual fins on fish like guppies have been found and secured, same goes I imagine with the CRS shrimp as I believe they originally were a rare color morph found coming from CBS, then someone isolated that trait through cube line breedingBelow is what I believe to be correct maths for the cubing process, the aim is to show how many generations to get to a rough percent of the desired genetics, in this case represented as a TB as that's what spurred the talk. After 7 generations you'll break into 99% original parent DNA, second gen you are past 75% and that's why you'll start to see an increase in the numbers of TB phenotypes occurring, I'm not sure but I believe the TB traits to be recessive (like albinism) which would explain why typically at 50% TB genetics you wont see many TB phenotypes expressed100% (TB) + 0% divided by 2 = 50%100% (TB) + 50% divided by 2 = 75%100% (TB) + 75% divided by 2 = 87.5%100% (TB) + 87.5% divided by 2 = 93.75%100% (TB) + 93.75% divided by 2 = 96.875%100% (TB) + 96.875% divided by 2 = 98.437%100% (TB) + 98.437% divided by 2 = 99.2185%I hope this is at least partially correct, would be embarrasing if I'm completely on the wrong track. But if not well I hope this helps some people get an idea at just how pure the F4 TBM's or whatever it is you are looking at are.Goodluck and happy breeding!-BristledOne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread.The point I was trying to make was once the line is contaminated it will never be pure.And that people can only guarantee for the generations that they have personally produced .Have breed fish this way for at least 20 years and had great results.Now I am moving my efforts to my shrimp.Was also making the point that A shrimp is only worth what someone is willing to pay.There are some good breeders here that strive on securing their bloodlines and strengthening the desired traits so we all can enjoy them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definately agree with you, as we can see here once you taint a bloodline the numbers will rarely get back to 100% pure. In Australia especially we dont get to call many of our shrimp "pure" only pure for the time we keep them, we know that we cant import PRL's for example that's why stunning breeders like Squiggles and Bluebolts do what they can to secure and strengthen the bloodlines that are already within our waters. It takes time, effort, skill and patience to get some of these bloodlines to where they are. Sadly it takes little to no effort at all to ruin them again if the wrong person gets them. Was hoping that these numbers can be used to back up points like yours, at the end of the day you often get what you pay for and these F2, F3's out there are no where near pure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem being that some people get into it because they think of making a quick buck with little to no effort on quality.Find that after 12 to 48 months they have burnt their bridges by suppling poor quality stock or ripping people off.Then leaving the hobby but by then the damage is done.This happens in every animal keeping hobby not just ours.Love that you put the % chart up.Hope it helps a lot of members understand what,how and why thing happen in their tanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting topic, and interesting maths on the gene transfer maths. I'm curious to know what species or reproduction model you are basing this on, as shrimp gene transfer or any animal that has small generation intervals with many young have much lower input of gene transmission then human to human reproduction for example. Either way its good to see people considering the genetics of their bloodlines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know without DNA testing you can never tell the exact % of genetics transferred, whether shrimp, people or plants. If you have information about whether the female or male passes on the most genetics though that would be an interesting read for sure!

as far as what model I've based its not catered to a specific species it's just maths based on the assumption that the male and female each provide an equal 50% towards the offspring, but that 50% doesn't necessarily visual show it's just being carried.

But for now as best as I can tell your F1's should throw out the widest range of phenotypes (again keep in mind some traits are dominant) as it's got a wider mix of genetics but as you cube back to the parent each successive generation should imitate the parent more and more and the recessive traits start to emerge more or become refined)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • sdlTBfanUK
      I would hazard a guess that perhaps those eggs were unfertilized and thereby unviable? Did the eggs change colour, usually yellow to grey as the yolks used up, or any eyes in the eggs. Is your water ok, using RO remineralised and the parameters in range, as I have heard others say that if the water isn't good it can 'force' a molt? How is it going overall, do you have a good size colony in the tank, you may have reached 'maximum occupancy' as a tank can only support so many occupants.
    • beanbag
      Hello folks,  The current problem I am having is that my Taiwan bee shrimp are molting before all their eggs have hatched.  Often the shrimp keep the eggs for 40+ days.  During that time, they lose about half or so, either due to dropping or duds or whatever.  Shortly before molting they look to have about a dozen left, and then they molt with about half a dozen eggs still on the shell.  Then the other shirmp will come and eat the shell.  These last few times, I have been getting around 0-3 surviving babies per batch.  I figure I can make the eggs hatch faster by raising the water temperature more (currently around 68F, which is already a few degrees higher than I used to keep it) or make the shrimp grow slower by feeding them less (protein).  Currently I feed Shrimp King complete every other day, and also a small dab of Shrimp Fit alternating days.  Maybe I can start alternating with more vegetable food like mulberry?  or just decrease the amount of food?
    • ngoomie
      Yeah, cancer risk was a thing I'd seen mentioned a lot when looking into gentian violet briefly. I kinda just figured it might only be as bad as the cancer risk of malachite green as well, but maybe I should look into it more. I've been doing a pretty good job of not getting it on my skin and also avoiding dunking my unprotected hands into the tank water while treating my fish at least, though. Maybe I'll just not use it once I'm done this course of medication anyways, because I know a store I can sometimes get to that's pretty distant carries both malachite green and methylene blue, and in pretty large quantities.
    • jayc
      Can't help you with Gentian Violet, sorry. It is banned in Australia violet for potential toxicity, and even possible cancer risks. I thought it was banned in Canada as well. At least, you now know why there isn't much info on gentian violet medication and it's use. But keep an eye on the snails after a week. If it affects the snails, it might not kill them immediately. So keep checking for up to a week. Much safer options out there. No point risking your own life over unsafe products.
    • ngoomie
      Hello! I have a tank that currently does not contain shrimp, but does contain neon tetras which I am currently treating for Ich, as well as some bladder snails. Shrimp will be a later addition, likely cherry shrimp but I'm still doing research just to be sure. Initially I'd intended to buy some sort of Ich-fighting product that contains malachite green after doing a decent bit of research on it, most of which indicated that it should be shrimp-safe so I'd be good if I ever needed to use it again once shrimp were actually introduced (though I should note I'm aware shrimp can't get Ich, I'm more wondering in case the tetras could get Ich again, or something else that responds to similar medication). I ended up not being able to find any MG-containing products without either having to travel quite far or wait multiple days for delivery (which I was worried could lead the Ich to be fatal), and ended up picking up 'Top Fin Ick Remedy', a product that contains gentian violet which is a triarylmethane dye like malachite green. The bottle has two slightly differently worded warnings about its use with invertebrates ("not recommended for" and "not safe for" respectively), but when I'd been researching malachite green, I'd also heard of products that contain MG but not any other ingredients that would be harmful to inverts still being branded with warnings that they could be harmful, just as a "just-in-case" since the manufacturer didn't test it on any inverts, and I'm wondering if maybe it could be a similar situation here. I'm having a very very hard time finding information about gentian violet's use in fishkeeping at all though, it seems currently extremely uncommon. What I will say though is that I'm on day 2 of treating my tetras with it, and the bladder snails seem just fine -- in fact today I noticed what looked to be a bladder snail that appeared to be newly hatched (because of its size) that I hadn't seen before that was zipping around the tank without issue. But obviously, shrimp are not snails, and bladder snails are also notoriously hardy little guys, so what I'm seeing right now could easily be totally inapplicable to cherry shrimp. It might even be inapplicable to other species of snails, for all I know. Has anyone else here ever used anything that contains gentian violet in a tank that actually does contain shrimp? Were they okay, or should I make sure to not use it once shrimp are added?
×
×
  • Create New...