Jump to content

help with picking out the correct filter


ineke

Recommended Posts

  • HOF Member

hi All'

Im looking to get my first canister filter or a hang on back filter- it is for a 100 litre tank divided by a sponge so needs a spray bar or ability to take water from 1 area and return it to another area of the tank- other side of the sponge. What size should I get as to litres per hour- I have been to 4 shops today and apart from prices being miles apart for the same thing the info given has me more confused than helped.

I don't have a huge budget but also don't want to just get one because it's cheap. Any suggestions? It will house Crystals and Michlings for now but should be good enough for higher quality down the track a bit. Once I've got a bit of an idea of the actual size I need I will research a bit more. If you have had a bad experience with a particular filter but cant name it on the forum a pm would be good but for now just help me out for what I should look for in a good filter would be great. I will also be running sponge filters in the tanks. Thanks- please don't confuse me anymore than I already am simple terms would be absolutely great.

Cheers:encouragement:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ineke

    23

  • Squiggle

    8

  • shrimpstan

    7

  • CNgo2006

    3

The requirement of drawing from one side and returning to another rules out a hang on back. The ones I've seen literally draw a couple of centimetres

from the return so no good. For a 100L tank you're looking at generally at least a 600lhr to allow for pressure drop, I'd probably go for up to 1000lhr

if you can justify it, especially if you're looking at a spray bar for the return as that adds additional pressure as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Thanks BigD. There are some no name brands available with uv light included that look good but don't give much info. Is there any particular one that you have success with? I have been using an UG filter in this tank and it's kept it really crystal clear but I'm changing to shrimp soil and have been told it will clog up so at a loss with brands and quality,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran an Aqua one 750 canister on a 3ft tank full of red cherries for over 12 months. I only decommisioned the tank when I built my rack system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Thanks John ive been looking at some that are similar and have a small uv light inside as well . It's a matter of picking a well known brand against not so well known the price differences are huge yet specs and warranties are the same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi have an eheim 2213 canister which is 440LPH, as well as a fleabay $40 800LPH canister running n 4footer. The eheim i've had for

12 years now and its still running perfectly which is amazing, I'm not sure if I've just been lucky or they're really that well built. The fleabay I've had for 6months now and it runs every well and as of yet I have not had any issues with it.

If I had to buy a canister again I would probably go with another fleabay canister, 1/4 of the price and does exactly the same job. I think from memory you can get a 1800LPH one with inbuilt UV for under $100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Thanks Gravychic sounds like the cheaper ones I'm looking at I've started to read some bad reviews on the eheim now they are being built in china , noisy and power hungry. You probably have the original filter if its 12 years old. I have an old internal eheim that's absolutely great but the newer ones aren't as good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You definitely can't beat the original Eheim Classic 2213, definitely the most reliable filter on the market but some people call me an Eheim snob, lol :smiley_simmons: I know it doesn't have a UV sterilizer but a good ten years plus out of it. My Eheim canisters have been going for about fifteen years now without any fault or failure :victorious:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Yes Squiggle but the reviews for the new ones are not so good. I mentioned the internal one I have that's an oldie and has lasted for years without any problems I don't know if that would be good enough for the tank it's big enough but only runs on a sponge insert or my half sponge and purigen. It was great for my fish in that tank together with the UG filter. Need more bio material I think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? Even the "classic" series? They haven't changed design in twenty years, the "classic" series revolutionized the aquarium hobby :encouragement:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

I'm pretty sure since they changed where they are made the newer ones aren't up to standard. But that's just a few reviews I've read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

You know now I'm going to have doubts and won't be able to sleep and worry all night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ok, I thought the bad reviews were about the newer model Eheims :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add to your confusion, my vote is for the eheim classic.... All my tanks have 2211's, 2213's, 2215's and 2217's.... Great filters, spares are readily available if required, and mine are quite. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Could be I will have another look tomorrow it's late now and my head is in a muddle. What ever I get I will have to order it soon to get it all cycled and the shrimp back in there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Hi BB to save me wading through more reviews which size will I need for the 100 or slightly less litres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

Great thanks Squiggle now just to get the nod from Alan* but that's for tomorrow he laying here snoring away better not wake him up:encouragement:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep an eye on my FS thread. There will be a 2213 up on that. #Shameless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi BB to save me wading through more reviews which size will I need for the 100 or slightly less litres.

Depends on head height, i.e. if the cannister is 1+ m below the tank, a larger capacity wouldn't hurt, as there'll be loss flow. Although too much flow/circulation can be an issue, there no such thing as over filteration. I'd go for the 2215, have the spray bar sitting about the water level, causing surface agitation, reducing circulation, and hava a higher flow rate....can't go wrong !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HOF Member

The canister would be higher than that and I will be standing it on something to keep it out of the dogs way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check back in about 5 minutes. Ill put the 2213 on priority post-age. Early morning puns hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on head height' date=' i.e. if the cannister is 1+ m below the tank, a larger capacity wouldn't hurt, as there'll be loss flow. Although too much flow/circulation can be an issue, there no such thing as over filteration. I'd go for the 2215, have the spray bar sitting about the water level, causing surface agitation, reducing circulation, and hava a higher flow rate....can't go wrong ![/quote']

+1 on the 2215. There's usually not a massive price difference between the models so you may as well go one up as you can never have too much filtration! When I bought mine (I have a 2217) there was like $20 between it and the 2215...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • ngoomie
      Alright, I've done a bit more research on gentian violet's cancer-causing potential but I haven't yet done research on malachite green's to compare. But from reading the California propositon 65 document about GV (North Americans incl. some Canadians will recognize this as the law that causes some products they buy to be labelled with "known to the state of California to cause cancer", including the exact product I bought) it seems that the risk of cancer is related to internal use, either injection or ingestion. Speaking of ingestion, I think GV bans mainly relate to its use in treating fish/shrimp/etc. which are intended for human consumption, because of the above. And in countries where GV isn't banned for this purpose, it does seem to get used on various species of shrimp without causing any issue for the shrimp themselves (at least enough so for shrimp farming purposes). See the following: In February, the FDA Began Rejecting Imported Shrimp for Gentian Violet and Chloramphenicol (2022 article by Southern Shrimp Alliance) FDA Starts New Calendar Year by Refusing Antibiotic-Contaminated Shrimp from Three BAP-Certified Indian Processors and Adding a BAP-Certified Vietnamese Processor to Import Alert (2024 article by Southern Shrimp Alliance) Southern Shrimp Alliance and some other organizations have tons of other articles in this vein, but I'd be here for a while and would end up writing an absolutely massive post if I were to link every instance I found of articles mentioning shrimp shipments with gentian violet and/or leucogentian violet registering as contaminants. That being said, I know shrimp farmed for consumption and dwarf shrimp are often somewhat distantly related (in fact, the one time a shrimp's species name is listed that I can see, it's the prawn sp. Macrobrachium rosenbergii, who at best occupies the same infraorder as Neocaridina davidi but nothing nearer), but this at least gives a slightly better way of guessing whether it will be safe for aquarium dwarf shrimp or not than my bladder snail anecdote from the OP.
    • sdlTBfanUK
      I would hazard a guess that perhaps those eggs were unfertilized and thereby unviable? Did the eggs change colour, usually yellow to grey as the yolks used up, or any eyes in the eggs. Is your water ok, using RO remineralised and the parameters in range, as I have heard others say that if the water isn't good it can 'force' a molt? How is it going overall, do you have a good size colony in the tank, you may have reached 'maximum occupancy' as a tank can only support so many occupants.
    • beanbag
      Hello folks,  The current problem I am having is that my Taiwan bee shrimp are molting before all their eggs have hatched.  Often the shrimp keep the eggs for 40+ days.  During that time, they lose about half or so, either due to dropping or duds or whatever.  Shortly before molting they look to have about a dozen left, and then they molt with about half a dozen eggs still on the shell.  Then the other shirmp will come and eat the shell.  These last few times, I have been getting around 0-3 surviving babies per batch.  I figure I can make the eggs hatch faster by raising the water temperature more (currently around 68F, which is already a few degrees higher than I used to keep it) or make the shrimp grow slower by feeding them less (protein).  Currently I feed Shrimp King complete every other day, and also a small dab of Shrimp Fit alternating days.  Maybe I can start alternating with more vegetable food like mulberry?  or just decrease the amount of food?
    • ngoomie
      Yeah, cancer risk was a thing I'd seen mentioned a lot when looking into gentian violet briefly. I kinda just figured it might only be as bad as the cancer risk of malachite green as well, but maybe I should look into it more. I've been doing a pretty good job of not getting it on my skin and also avoiding dunking my unprotected hands into the tank water while treating my fish at least, though. Maybe I'll just not use it once I'm done this course of medication anyways, because I know a store I can sometimes get to that's pretty distant carries both malachite green and methylene blue, and in pretty large quantities.
    • jayc
      Can't help you with Gentian Violet, sorry. It is banned in Australia violet for potential toxicity, and even possible cancer risks. I thought it was banned in Canada as well. At least, you now know why there isn't much info on gentian violet medication and it's use. But keep an eye on the snails after a week. If it affects the snails, it might not kill them immediately. So keep checking for up to a week. Much safer options out there. No point risking your own life over unsafe products.
×
×
  • Create New...