Jump to content

Dean's (Ec) vs BlueBolts (TDS)


BlueBolts

Recommended Posts

Very helpful thread, just bought myself a TDS pen and worked out its conversion is 0.5, Getting readings on some new tanks that are cycling of 150PPM which i think is good. (plan on keeping crs/cbs)

Thanks again mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Can someone provide some example maths using these "conversion factors" sorry?

Because I'm trying to get my head around how it works as I use Bluelab's way and the way typically adopted in Aquaponics.

From EC to ppm500 (American) EC of 0.4*500= 200

From EC to ppm700 (Aus standard) EC @ 0.4*700= 280

So working backwards if I knew my TDS on an Australian meter I'd divide by divide by 700, or an american meter I'd divide by 500 both bringing me back to the 0.4 EC I know to be true...

So I cant help but wonder as I have trouble following the OP what maths everyone else is using? and whether perhaps as people are using different meters with different equations we should actually adopt the international standard of EC ratings like as being seen in the Hydro/Aquaponics industries? Might help make water parameter discussions a little easier as we'd know we're all on the same unit of measurement. Just my 2c

-edit-

This is driving me mad, Because as an example of converting days to hours the conversion factor is "24". 2days*24 = 48 (Hours)

But if you were to try to get from say an american TDS of 200 (that's 200 @500ppm) then multiplying by 0.5 would get you to 100, when the EC rating is actually 0.4 and would be attained with a conversion factor of 0.002 (200* 0.002 = 0.4)

I feel like I'm missing something obvious here :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's possible dude, you'd have to get all the manufacturers of TDS pens to work off a standard conversion factor. The only one that is standard measuring device is an EC pen as they all use the same measuring unit without conversion. The thing with TDS pens is it all depends on what chemical they are calibrated with, whether it's NaCl or KCl, they both have a different conversion factor from EC. :encouragement:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but Bluelab truncheons don't even need calibration, which is what I use. Joys of a device that displays CF, EC, ppm500, ppm700 and needs no calibration to use...

I'm just trying to figure out this headache that others have to go through, which it sounds like anyone with a TDS pen should be doing. Otherwise when you all display your ppm ratings of your water parameters without knowing how it's being calculated then it's not that useful. It would be like having multiple ph scales in use but not being able to directly compare them.

If all probes read at EC, then convert to ppm displays then it makes complete sense to me for everyone to calculate their EC ratings as it's a scale we would all be able to compare against. Because otherwise if what you say is true and that it's not possible then everyone should throw away their tds pens and start using EC as it's again sounding like the only unit with some sense to it.

as an example if I was to start measuring shrimp in inches at least it's known to my buyer what inches can convert into. But buying shrimp with water parameters of a TDS@220 means little if we cant convert it to either EC (accepted unwavering standard) or to each others TDS ratings.

-edit-

oh and squiggles I edited my first post not knowing you had responded sorry, but please check the maths for me in my previous post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are over complicating it, the simple way for this to be solved is for the buyer to test the water their new shrimp come in with their own TDS pen & also slow acclimation is a definite necessity. I completely agree that we should probably use EC as a standard parameter but EC pens are not as freely available & definitely not as cheap as a TDS pen. Also, not everyone can afford a $100-$200 piece of equipment when a cheap $15 TDS pen will do the job. As with everything, what works for you may not work for someone else, I have crystal shrimp living in TDS values ranging from 150ppm to around 300ppm. I would not try the higher values with Taiwan Bees or Tigers but if people are buying $200-$500 shrimp then they will probably be able to afford a more adequate pen. No TDS pen or EC pen should ever need calibration but calibration is mainly used to initially set these instruments.

I can understand your confusion trying to work this out, having a single parameter that would make it a bit easier but I fear you will be trying to change what already works for a great majority of shrimp keepers around the world. :encouragement:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Well, very interesting and usefull topic.

At the early times of my hobby, I have serious issues with PPM metering and targeting. Changing my pens to EC meters helped me very much to be succesful breeding taiwan bees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Iv been on here for about a year and a half and im only reading this for the first time lol very informative once again Marcus well done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • beanbag
      Update to say that after a few gravel vacs, front wall scrub, moss / floating plant trim, that the condition seems to have improved.  My current theory is that it is due to waste / debris management, where "stuff" like that brown mulm accumulates in the substrate and behind the HMF filters.  Maybe some tanks can somehow deal with it, but mine can't.  Also another experienced shrimper suggested that maybe those "shell bugs" don't just live on the shrimps but also in this debris.  Maybe this is the reason some tanks fail due to "old tank syndrome" where all they need is a good gravel vac? Also, I am guessing that plant trim helps too because now more of the nutrients and light go into growing algae instead of more plants? Well anyway for this tank I will try weekly water change and monthly gravel vac / plant trim.  For my next tank, I'm thinking of something like an under-gravel system where this mulm can fall down and I vac it out.
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Good to have an update and good to hear you are getting shrimplets, so hopefully your colony will continue and you may not get to the point where you have to cull some to stop over population. These type of shrimp only live 12 - 18 months so the adult deaths may be natural? If you have the time I would do weekly 25% water changes, adding the new water via a drip system and do some vacuuming clean of the substrate each week, even if only a different bit each week! See if that helps in a few months and if it does then stick with that regime? It should help reduce any build-ups that may be occuring!
    • beanbag
      Hello again, much belated update: The tank still has "cycles" of 1-2 month "good streaks" where everybody seems to be doing well, and then a bad streak where the short antenna problem shows up again, and a shrimp dies once every few days.  I am not sure what causes things to go bad, but usually over the course of a few days I will start to see more shrimp quietly standing on the HMF filter, and so I know something is wrong.  Since I am not "doing anything" besides the regular 1-2 week water changes, I just assume that something bad is building up.  Here's a list of things that I've tried that are supposed to be "can't hurt" but didn't prevent the problem either: Dose every other day with Shrimp Fit (very small dose, and the shrimp seem to like it) Sotching Oxydator Seachem Purigen to keep the nitrates lower Keeping the pH below 5.5 with peat Things that I don't do often, so could possibly "reset" the tank back to a good streak, are gravel vac and plant trim, so maybe time to try those again. One other problem I used to have was that sometimes a shrimp would suddenly stop eating with a full or partially full digestive tract that doesn't clear out, and then the shrimp will die within a few days.  I suspected it was one of the foods in my rotation - Shrimp Nature Infection, which contains a bunch of herbal plant things.  I've had this in my food rotation for a few years now and generally didn't seem to cause problems, but I removed it from the rotation anyway.  I don't have a lot of adult Golden Bees at this point so I can't really tell if it worked or not. Overall the tank is not too bad - during the good streaks occasionally a shrimp will get berried and hatch babies with a 33-50% survival rate.  So while there are fewer adults now, there are also a bunch of babies roaming around.  I guess this tank will stagger on, but I really do need to take the time to start up a new tank.  (or figure out the problem)
    • jayc
      If that is the offspring, then the parents are unlikely to be PRL. I tend to agree with you. There are very few PRLs in Australia. And any that claim to be needs to show proof. PRL genes have to start as PRL. CRS that breed true after x generations doesn't turn it into a PRL. Neither can a Taiwan bee shrimp turn into a PRL despite how ever many generations. I've never seen a PRL with that sort of red colour. I have on Red Wines and Red Shadows - Taiwan bee shrimps. So somewhere down the line one of your shrimp might have been mixed with Taiwan bees and is no longer PRL. It just tanks one shrimp to mess up the genes of a whole colony. 
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Sorry, missed this one somehow! The PRL look fantastic and the odd ones look part PRL and part Red wine/Red shadow in the colour. They are still very beautiful but ideally should be seperated to help keep the PRL clean if you can do that.  Nice clear photos!
×
×
  • Create New...