Jump to content

TDS question


Michael Petro

Recommended Posts

I am keeping a large Cichlid tank, and a heavily planted RCS Shrimp tank , both sharing the same wet/dry filter. Basicly the planted shrimp tank is a refugium to keep the nitrates down in the cichlid tank, with shrimp added for the coolness factor. Consequently I am trying to achieve a balance of water conditions that will allow both tanks to thrive.

 

I have added an "automatic water changer" feature that is triggered by TDS. I monitor TDS and when it reaches a certain point (currently 150ppm) I do an automatic 5% water change. The result is that my TDS will rise to 150ppm and then drop 145ppm.

 

I have the ability to change as much water as I want whenever the TDS trip point is reached, and the ability to set that TDS trigger at any ppm I want.

 

My question is this, is it better to do small water changes or large ones, i.e. small TDS changes or larger ones? Water consumption being the concern, larger wtaer changes would conserve more water in the long run, but result in bigger TDS swings. Currently, it is doing a 5% water change about every 20 hours.

 

Capture_zpspwbkmf2a.jpg

 

 

DSCN1074_zpsevevv9tz.jpg

 

I let pieces of coral collect algae and mulm in the big cichlid tank and then drop them in the shrimp tank, the shrimp will totally "bleach" the coral in an hour or two. This piece was completely covered in green/brown slime an hour ago.

DSCN1073_zpshkkh7zzs.jpg

 

DSCN1042_zpsbd3ef7d5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smaller water changes would be better, because the big ones will shock the fish and shrimp more, if you ever wants to adjust anything like ph TDS, its best to do it slowly rather than fast

 

nice looking tanks by the way.

Edited by perplex
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes days for my tank to raise TDS from 145 to 150. Not 20 hours.

I believe some of your rocks or substrate is raising TDS.

If you gave the RCS their own tank, you will save on water changes. Remember I said shrimp and cichlids need vastly different water parameters?

Edited by jayc
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael, definitely smaller more frequent changes are better. I have to say though that 150ppm TDS is incredibly low for an African Cichlid tank, even though they're just Malawi fish. We run them at more like 300ppm GH over here with high KH too, TDS would have to be over 400ppm. Having a look again at the schematic (nice setup btw) I don't understand how your GH is 180, KH 80 and yet TDS lower than than combined total. Something is not measuring accurately. Calibrate the TDS monitor and change the water change set point higher!  

 

JayC, it's not unusual for African tanks to have alkaline buffering substrates and rock. You want to run the hardness higher than those substrates will buffer to alone and the water change regime stops levels getting out of whack. I guess in this setup the RCS have to cope with the parameters and they look fine. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JayC, it's not unusual for African tanks to have alkaline buffering substrates and rock. You want to run the hardness higher than those substrates will buffer to alone and the water change regime stops levels getting out of whack. I guess in this setup the RCS have to cope with the parameters and they look fine.

yes, I know, and that's what I mean. You need to constantly change water to keep it in control. No water saving there, which seems to be Mikes concern.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@kizshrimp - You were right, my TDS meter was off, I broke out the calibration salt and got it dead on the money, it was about 50ppm low.

Today's readings:

  • Kh 6dh
  • Gh 10dh
  • TDS 192

To your point though, my TDS is still less than the combined kh and gh. Does it really work that way? Or is it possible that the two tests could be reading some of the same stuff. I used API titration style test kits. I am confident in the values assuming the reagents are accurate, they are less than 6 months old.

 

Also, you were spot on about the substrate, it a mixture of Rift Lake substrate and regular gravel, with large baseball size pieces of coral added in as well. My tap water is about 7.2 after 24 hours, (but 7.4 out of the tap) and my tanks buffer out around 7.4. Also spot on about the Malawis, mostly Aulonocara and other Haps, a dozen Synodontis cats, some Nerite snails, but no Mbuna, was shooting for a more peaceful tank this time. I have done a lot of Victorians in the past, I love them but they are just too aggressive for this tank.

 

Anyway, I changed my TDS meter to a setpoint of 250ppm to trigger the water changes. The rate of rise on the TDS is a lot slower now.

 

@jayc – you are certainly right. I know I am pushing the envelope here, trying to run the Africans at the lower end of their range, and the RCS and green Babaulti at the upper end of their range. I “think” I can make it work. The RCS colony is certainly thriving, lots of population growth, the babaulti isn’t yet, but then I just got them a few weeks ago. The cichlids seem plenty happy too, with frequent fry.

 

It is certainly working for my original goal, with was to reduce the nitrates in my big tank. My nitrates measured around 5 today, where they used to be around 40.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Michael, glad you found the  issue easily. I knew something was off. I am also confident your reagents are fine, in my experience the API kits don't work at all once the reagents go off. The 2 tests must be reading some of the same thing; probably KH generated largely from Ca in your system but Na or K in mine. There's others here on SKF with better chemistry knowledge than me. 

 

I think I see some Protomelas - similis or taeniolatus? An unmistakable Copadichromis borleyi juv on the left. Actually some mbuna are relatively ok but most are a problem. I too love Victorians but true they are aggressive. There's not too many here in Aus, I guess our import restrictions restrict their entry, and their lower popularity doesn't encourage the smugglers. My real soft spot is for Tanganyikans though and I feel as though I'll be setting up for some again soon. 

 

Very happy to hear your planted refugium is pulling down the nitrates effectively. Do you keep it on the same light cycle as the Cichlid display or alternating? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The proto is a taeniolatus (Red Empress) and is one of my faves, and yes on the C. borleyi.

 

Similar light cycle, not opposing, as some do for ph stabilization. Main reason is I want to be able to see both tanks during my normal waking hours. With the large body of water I have I dont see much ph swing and I dont inject CO2. Although I do dose a half dose of generic Glutaraldehyde (akin to Seachem Excel), and some Seachem Iron, daily. The Hornwort you see in the cichlid display is actually fresh prunings from the shrimp tank, thats how crazy the plants are growing in the refugium. Interesting that the Africans dont mess with the Hornwort, but will demolish any other plant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just posted on another thread that Hornwort is the only thing we can get away with in a yabby tank. It's absolutely untouched, but he demolishes all other plants too. What is it with Ceratophyllum?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hehee, had to look that one up, learned something else today! Never heard of a "yabby" before, but certainly have seen them. Love the electric blue ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it with Ceratophyllum?

I have Ceratophyllum in my ponds and its my plant of choice for floating in breeding tanks and there is some in my shrimp tanks too.   It does have this scary ability ni low TDS water to be shocked into losing all its needles and what a mess that makes!  This week I sold a few shrimp and to hold lots after sorting for sale I put them in coffee jars with some horwort and bubbler... in the morning I had bare stems and shrimp in amongst needles... what a mess.  Had to pick all the shrimp out one by one to bag them.  So yes.  What is it with Ceratophyllum? :growl:

 

 

Michael I really like your automated changer setup.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have Ceratophyllum in my ponds and its my plant of choice for floating in breeding tanks and there is some in my shrimp tanks too.   It does have this scary ability ni low TDS water to be shocked into losing all its needles and what a mess that makes!  This week I sold a few shrimp and to hold lots after sorting for sale I put them in coffee jars with some horwort and bubbler... in the morning I had bare stems and shrimp in amongst needles... what a mess.  Had to pick all the shrimp out one by one to bag them.  So yes.  What is it with Ceratophyllum? :growl:

 

 

Michael I really like your automated changer setup.

I prefer java fern for this type of thing, absolutely bullet proof.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if you're in a shop ordering Ceratophyllum from the big live plant and food producer it's the only line they expressly provide no warranty on. It's too prone to melting during transport. I've never ordered it from Dave so I wonder how he gets on when shipping it.

What you say about low TDS is interesting Grubs, never checked that but I suppose transport air is low TDS so perhaps there's an answer to be found there? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will also loose its needles after a peroxide dip, about 48 hrs afterwards. Dont ask me how I know......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • beanbag
      Update to say that after a few gravel vacs, front wall scrub, moss / floating plant trim, that the condition seems to have improved.  My current theory is that it is due to waste / debris management, where "stuff" like that brown mulm accumulates in the substrate and behind the HMF filters.  Maybe some tanks can somehow deal with it, but mine can't.  Also another experienced shrimper suggested that maybe those "shell bugs" don't just live on the shrimps but also in this debris.  Maybe this is the reason some tanks fail due to "old tank syndrome" where all they need is a good gravel vac? Also, I am guessing that plant trim helps too because now more of the nutrients and light go into growing algae instead of more plants? Well anyway for this tank I will try weekly water change and monthly gravel vac / plant trim.  For my next tank, I'm thinking of something like an under-gravel system where this mulm can fall down and I vac it out.
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Good to have an update and good to hear you are getting shrimplets, so hopefully your colony will continue and you may not get to the point where you have to cull some to stop over population. These type of shrimp only live 12 - 18 months so the adult deaths may be natural? If you have the time I would do weekly 25% water changes, adding the new water via a drip system and do some vacuuming clean of the substrate each week, even if only a different bit each week! See if that helps in a few months and if it does then stick with that regime? It should help reduce any build-ups that may be occuring!
    • beanbag
      Hello again, much belated update: The tank still has "cycles" of 1-2 month "good streaks" where everybody seems to be doing well, and then a bad streak where the short antenna problem shows up again, and a shrimp dies once every few days.  I am not sure what causes things to go bad, but usually over the course of a few days I will start to see more shrimp quietly standing on the HMF filter, and so I know something is wrong.  Since I am not "doing anything" besides the regular 1-2 week water changes, I just assume that something bad is building up.  Here's a list of things that I've tried that are supposed to be "can't hurt" but didn't prevent the problem either: Dose every other day with Shrimp Fit (very small dose, and the shrimp seem to like it) Sotching Oxydator Seachem Purigen to keep the nitrates lower Keeping the pH below 5.5 with peat Things that I don't do often, so could possibly "reset" the tank back to a good streak, are gravel vac and plant trim, so maybe time to try those again. One other problem I used to have was that sometimes a shrimp would suddenly stop eating with a full or partially full digestive tract that doesn't clear out, and then the shrimp will die within a few days.  I suspected it was one of the foods in my rotation - Shrimp Nature Infection, which contains a bunch of herbal plant things.  I've had this in my food rotation for a few years now and generally didn't seem to cause problems, but I removed it from the rotation anyway.  I don't have a lot of adult Golden Bees at this point so I can't really tell if it worked or not. Overall the tank is not too bad - during the good streaks occasionally a shrimp will get berried and hatch babies with a 33-50% survival rate.  So while there are fewer adults now, there are also a bunch of babies roaming around.  I guess this tank will stagger on, but I really do need to take the time to start up a new tank.  (or figure out the problem)
    • jayc
      If that is the offspring, then the parents are unlikely to be PRL. I tend to agree with you. There are very few PRLs in Australia. And any that claim to be needs to show proof. PRL genes have to start as PRL. CRS that breed true after x generations doesn't turn it into a PRL. Neither can a Taiwan bee shrimp turn into a PRL despite how ever many generations. I've never seen a PRL with that sort of red colour. I have on Red Wines and Red Shadows - Taiwan bee shrimps. So somewhere down the line one of your shrimp might have been mixed with Taiwan bees and is no longer PRL. It just tanks one shrimp to mess up the genes of a whole colony. 
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Sorry, missed this one somehow! The PRL look fantastic and the odd ones look part PRL and part Red wine/Red shadow in the colour. They are still very beautiful but ideally should be seperated to help keep the PRL clean if you can do that.  Nice clear photos!
×
×
  • Create New...