Jump to content

Salifert Calcium & JBL Magnesium Test Kits


nerowolfe

Recommended Posts

Recently joined this forum, and new to CRS, but I have been keeping either freshwater fish, marine fish or an aquascape, for over 45 years.

Through this forum I discovered the importance of the Ca:Mg ratio in successfully keeping & breeding CRS, but was dismayed by the accuracy of the Calcium test kits commonly available, (all only differenciate increments of 20ppm), and no Magnesium Test kit (for freshwater), so I went online and researched, and what I found were the Salifert Calcium test kit for Fresh & Salt water, and the JBL Magnesium test kit for Freshwater, both of which had good reviews overseas, and a much better resolution of concentration.

The Salifert I could source locally, (from one of our sponsors), and the JBL, I had to source from the UK. UK post was efficient, more so than the much closer Hong Kong / PRC sources, and I received the kit within 8 days.

I have now used both kits twice and compared their results to the accepted formula, when only using a Calcium test kit alone, and I have to say, the results are quite markedly different.

Using the formula, and using Hagen/Nutrafin gH & Calcium (accuracy of 20ppm), test kits, the water tested as follows:  gH = 8  &  Ca = 60ppm

From the formula & compared against the available spreadsheet calculator, I got the following: Mg = -1.7ppm and a ratio of  -34.6 : 1  What sort of ratio is that!!

I then tested using the Salifert Ca test kit and the JBL Mg test kit and got the following:

   Ca = 50ppm  * the calcium test kit can differenciate to 10ppm

   Mg = 8ppm   * the magnesium test kit resolves 0 to 10 ppm then > 10ppm, with 5 to 10ppm being listed as OK.

This then gives the following ratio:   6.25 : 1  ** now it makes sense, not perfect, but but much better, and a solid indicator of what needs to be addressed.

From my point of view, I now have a better understanding of the true situation, and can work to adjust the ratio sensibly.

What are your thoughts on this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @nerowolfe,

Firstly, I have no experience with the Magnesium test from JBL. I have however tested every single Calcium test on the market and Salifert is highly accurate.

I am going to hazard a guess that the JBL Mg test is not giving you as accurate results as the evidence lies in your equation that does not balance to meet your GH of 8.

I have to mention that many successful breeders do not worry about the ratios. I however do as it brings out brilliant colouring in shrimp with blue tone IMHO within 3 weeks of correcting the ratio.

Salty Shrimp remineralise ra have a ratio of 3.79:1 which is in the sweet spot.

Your first Calculation by using Salifert Ca-test only where you have a negative value of -1.7 (-1.66) indicates that your Calcium/Magnesium ratio is off- in other words you have a Magnesium deficiency. This however cannot just be rectified by adding Magnesium as I have reverse-manipulated your GH equation and for a GH of 8, your Calcium is too high for a Ca:Mg ratio of 4:1.

GHppm= (Cappm x 2.5) + (Mgppm x 4.1)

GH 8 = 143.2 ppm from test kit table

Your Ca = 60 ppm as tested, if you add Mg to a ratio of 4:1, Ca:Mg will be 60:15, but this will shoot up GH to 14!

If you want a ratio of Ca:Mg of 4:1 in your tank, your Calcium needs to be approx 40ppm and your Mg needs to be approx 10ppm.

If you find the source of your high Calcium in your tank like mineral balls etc, remove a few and with a few water changes over a few weeks, the balance in Ca:Mg ratio will be restored wit SS remineralised.

If you have a heavily planted tank, some plants may be chowing your Magnesium ( unlikely due to your GH).

If you are still not happy with the ratio after a couple of weeks, I will be glad to help you calculate how much MgSO4 ( Epsom salts)  to add safely as the sulphate group is heavy and you cannot just weigh out the weight in milligrams as Magnesium.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just like to add the reason why I disregarded the second combination test in your post:

GH is the most stable parameter you have to work with in your tank. Whichever test kit you use, that in combination with either a Ca or Mg test will deliver more stable results. So if your test kit for GH consistently tests GH 8, your ratio mentioned in your combined test that got you Ca 50 and Mg 8, will push the GH to 8.81 ( it will measure as 9 GH on API).

The GH equation has 3 variables: GH, Ca, Mg. I would suggest picking the ones you can most accurately test and Calculate the third. There is a reason why very few companies manufacture Mg- testing kits for FW: the low concentrations of Mg is incredibly hard to measure with a test. Just look at how hard it is to find an accurate Calcium test, and Calcium is 3-5 times higher than Mg in a natural FW Body.

 

Good luck?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thanks KeenShrimp. I will manage from now on using just GH & Ca test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • beanbag
      Update to say that after a few gravel vacs, front wall scrub, moss / floating plant trim, that the condition seems to have improved.  My current theory is that it is due to waste / debris management, where "stuff" like that brown mulm accumulates in the substrate and behind the HMF filters.  Maybe some tanks can somehow deal with it, but mine can't.  Also another experienced shrimper suggested that maybe those "shell bugs" don't just live on the shrimps but also in this debris.  Maybe this is the reason some tanks fail due to "old tank syndrome" where all they need is a good gravel vac? Also, I am guessing that plant trim helps too because now more of the nutrients and light go into growing algae instead of more plants? Well anyway for this tank I will try weekly water change and monthly gravel vac / plant trim.  For my next tank, I'm thinking of something like an under-gravel system where this mulm can fall down and I vac it out.
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Good to have an update and good to hear you are getting shrimplets, so hopefully your colony will continue and you may not get to the point where you have to cull some to stop over population. These type of shrimp only live 12 - 18 months so the adult deaths may be natural? If you have the time I would do weekly 25% water changes, adding the new water via a drip system and do some vacuuming clean of the substrate each week, even if only a different bit each week! See if that helps in a few months and if it does then stick with that regime? It should help reduce any build-ups that may be occuring!
    • beanbag
      Hello again, much belated update: The tank still has "cycles" of 1-2 month "good streaks" where everybody seems to be doing well, and then a bad streak where the short antenna problem shows up again, and a shrimp dies once every few days.  I am not sure what causes things to go bad, but usually over the course of a few days I will start to see more shrimp quietly standing on the HMF filter, and so I know something is wrong.  Since I am not "doing anything" besides the regular 1-2 week water changes, I just assume that something bad is building up.  Here's a list of things that I've tried that are supposed to be "can't hurt" but didn't prevent the problem either: Dose every other day with Shrimp Fit (very small dose, and the shrimp seem to like it) Sotching Oxydator Seachem Purigen to keep the nitrates lower Keeping the pH below 5.5 with peat Things that I don't do often, so could possibly "reset" the tank back to a good streak, are gravel vac and plant trim, so maybe time to try those again. One other problem I used to have was that sometimes a shrimp would suddenly stop eating with a full or partially full digestive tract that doesn't clear out, and then the shrimp will die within a few days.  I suspected it was one of the foods in my rotation - Shrimp Nature Infection, which contains a bunch of herbal plant things.  I've had this in my food rotation for a few years now and generally didn't seem to cause problems, but I removed it from the rotation anyway.  I don't have a lot of adult Golden Bees at this point so I can't really tell if it worked or not. Overall the tank is not too bad - during the good streaks occasionally a shrimp will get berried and hatch babies with a 33-50% survival rate.  So while there are fewer adults now, there are also a bunch of babies roaming around.  I guess this tank will stagger on, but I really do need to take the time to start up a new tank.  (or figure out the problem)
    • jayc
      If that is the offspring, then the parents are unlikely to be PRL. I tend to agree with you. There are very few PRLs in Australia. And any that claim to be needs to show proof. PRL genes have to start as PRL. CRS that breed true after x generations doesn't turn it into a PRL. Neither can a Taiwan bee shrimp turn into a PRL despite how ever many generations. I've never seen a PRL with that sort of red colour. I have on Red Wines and Red Shadows - Taiwan bee shrimps. So somewhere down the line one of your shrimp might have been mixed with Taiwan bees and is no longer PRL. It just tanks one shrimp to mess up the genes of a whole colony. 
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Sorry, missed this one somehow! The PRL look fantastic and the odd ones look part PRL and part Red wine/Red shadow in the colour. They are still very beautiful but ideally should be seperated to help keep the PRL clean if you can do that.  Nice clear photos!
×
×
  • Create New...