Jump to content

We are having a debate about the term Pure. Please have your say.


Disciple

Recommended Posts

Ok people time to make history we will start with a simple one for this we just need a yes or no answer we will define the term pure as it will relate to shrimp this is only single gene line shrimp no hybrids ie tibee, pinto, misch etc. Going forward in our hobby pure in reference to shrimp will mean the following any shrimp that produces and has produce all offspring of the same genetic make up as the parents for 3 or more generations shall be deemed pure.

These are some interesting responses that we have had.

1. Yes! But I'm not okay with just 3 generations to call it pure. As I told earlier in another discussion, I've been getting only crs offspring in my crs only tank for the past 2 years until now(2 golden bees after more than 10+ generations approx, meantime no new shrimps were added in the past 1.5 years)

2. Perhaps the term "true-breeding" (or pure-breeding) is more useful than pure, most if not all these things are hybrids after all. There are no wild species that correspond to a Taiwan/Shadow bee, for example. The true breeding stability comes from dilligent selection and line breeding for a given trait until no other traits occur. That's the hard part of the work and down to the quality of the breeder.

3. Well pure means pure, not 80<90 %.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the question is ...

"any shrimp that produces and has produce all offspring of the same genetic make up as the parents for 3 or more generations shall be deemed pure."

 

3 generations is not enough to deem any shrimp as pure if it has any mixed gene.

Take this article I wrote about genes for example. http://shrimpkeepersforum.com/forum/topic/7637-tibee-taitibee-pinto-mischling-f1-f2-terms-explained/?do=findComment&comment=93580

All it takes is for 2 shrimps carrying the recessive gene in the F2 or F3 generation to produce an unwanted gene.

The fact that you might not see it for several generations (or years) is just down to odds/chance of the shrimps carrying recessive genes mating.

Once a pure shrimp is mixed and carries genes of another type of shrimp( eg PRL with golden bee genes), then it will take many, many generations of breeding, and culling golden genes out before you would even consider it pure again. 

The fact that it might breed True for many generations, just means that the odds are high for the dominant gene.

The fact that it might breed True for many generations, also does not mean it is Pure. Cause, as I mentioned, it just takes that slim chance of two PRL recessive carriers of golden genes to spit out a Golden bee. And a Golden bee is not a PRL.

 

Edited by jayc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the question is ...

"any shrimp that produces and has produce all offspring of the same genetic make up as the parents for 3 or more generations shall be deemed pure."

 

3 generations is not enough to deem any shrimp as pure if it has any mixed gene.

Take this article I wrote about genes for example. http://shrimpkeepersforum.com/forum/topic/7637-tibee-taitibee-pinto-mischling-f1-f2-terms-explained/?do=findComment&comment=93580

All it takes is for 2 shrimps carrying the recessive gene in the F2 or F3 generation to produce an unwanted gene.

The fact that you might not see it for several generations (or years) is just down to odds/chance of the shrimps carrying recessive genes mating.

Once a pure shrimp is mixed and carries genes of another type of shrimp( eg PRL with golden bee genes), then it will take many, many generations of breeding, and culling golden genes out before you would even consider it pure again. 

The fact that it might breed True for many generations, just means that the odds are high for the dominant gene.

The fact that it might breed True for many generations, also does not mean it is Pure. Cause, as I mentioned, it just takes that slim chance of two PRL recessive carriers of golden genes to spit out a Golden bee. And a Golden bee is not a PRL.

 

So if I'm reading this right, and based on my limited knowledge of Mendelian genetics, recessive genes should definitely appear as a phenotype (i.e. affect the morphology or look of a shrimp) within three generations in at least 1/4,1/8 or 1/16 of the offspring depending on the number of generations, ect. Based on my interpretation of the definition of pure in the OP, the colony could no longer be called pure if ANY offspring showed up within three generations that were not the intended variant. If such offspring did show up, the count would need to start again. Hence any variant that has a hybrid lineage would take many, many generations to breed pure, if not ever. As suggested in another thread, a better name for these hybrid variants that breed true (or close to 100% true) would be "line bred".  

Hence I read the OP as CRS, CBS, cherry variants and other non-hybrid shrimp are the only shrimp that can ever be considered "pure" which is fair enough. That said, a hybrid variant that produces close to 100% offspring that are the same variant deserves recognition because this takes a lot of work on behalf of the shrimpkeeper - once again I think the term "line bred" is fitting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top of the class on mendelian genetics.  

The likelihood of the recessive phenotype appearing is reduced after 3 but it's never completely eliminated. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From memory I think they deem 7 generations before a cross bred line becomes pure again. But I suspect that somewhere deep in the genetics there will be some residual of the original cross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a can of worms - I've based my thoughts on Mendelian genetics. What if shrimp genetics dont conform to Mendelian genetics?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that 3 generations isn't enough to determine purity.

However, I also think that the term is of limited use anyway because when buying shrimp you're relying on un-observable information provided by a 3rd party.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Join Our Community!

    Register today, ask questions and share your shrimp and fish tank experiences with us!

  • Must Read SKF Articles

  • Posts

    • beanbag
      Update to say that after a few gravel vacs, front wall scrub, moss / floating plant trim, that the condition seems to have improved.  My current theory is that it is due to waste / debris management, where "stuff" like that brown mulm accumulates in the substrate and behind the HMF filters.  Maybe some tanks can somehow deal with it, but mine can't.  Also another experienced shrimper suggested that maybe those "shell bugs" don't just live on the shrimps but also in this debris.  Maybe this is the reason some tanks fail due to "old tank syndrome" where all they need is a good gravel vac? Also, I am guessing that plant trim helps too because now more of the nutrients and light go into growing algae instead of more plants? Well anyway for this tank I will try weekly water change and monthly gravel vac / plant trim.  For my next tank, I'm thinking of something like an under-gravel system where this mulm can fall down and I vac it out.
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Good to have an update and good to hear you are getting shrimplets, so hopefully your colony will continue and you may not get to the point where you have to cull some to stop over population. These type of shrimp only live 12 - 18 months so the adult deaths may be natural? If you have the time I would do weekly 25% water changes, adding the new water via a drip system and do some vacuuming clean of the substrate each week, even if only a different bit each week! See if that helps in a few months and if it does then stick with that regime? It should help reduce any build-ups that may be occuring!
    • beanbag
      Hello again, much belated update: The tank still has "cycles" of 1-2 month "good streaks" where everybody seems to be doing well, and then a bad streak where the short antenna problem shows up again, and a shrimp dies once every few days.  I am not sure what causes things to go bad, but usually over the course of a few days I will start to see more shrimp quietly standing on the HMF filter, and so I know something is wrong.  Since I am not "doing anything" besides the regular 1-2 week water changes, I just assume that something bad is building up.  Here's a list of things that I've tried that are supposed to be "can't hurt" but didn't prevent the problem either: Dose every other day with Shrimp Fit (very small dose, and the shrimp seem to like it) Sotching Oxydator Seachem Purigen to keep the nitrates lower Keeping the pH below 5.5 with peat Things that I don't do often, so could possibly "reset" the tank back to a good streak, are gravel vac and plant trim, so maybe time to try those again. One other problem I used to have was that sometimes a shrimp would suddenly stop eating with a full or partially full digestive tract that doesn't clear out, and then the shrimp will die within a few days.  I suspected it was one of the foods in my rotation - Shrimp Nature Infection, which contains a bunch of herbal plant things.  I've had this in my food rotation for a few years now and generally didn't seem to cause problems, but I removed it from the rotation anyway.  I don't have a lot of adult Golden Bees at this point so I can't really tell if it worked or not. Overall the tank is not too bad - during the good streaks occasionally a shrimp will get berried and hatch babies with a 33-50% survival rate.  So while there are fewer adults now, there are also a bunch of babies roaming around.  I guess this tank will stagger on, but I really do need to take the time to start up a new tank.  (or figure out the problem)
    • jayc
      If that is the offspring, then the parents are unlikely to be PRL. I tend to agree with you. There are very few PRLs in Australia. And any that claim to be needs to show proof. PRL genes have to start as PRL. CRS that breed true after x generations doesn't turn it into a PRL. Neither can a Taiwan bee shrimp turn into a PRL despite how ever many generations. I've never seen a PRL with that sort of red colour. I have on Red Wines and Red Shadows - Taiwan bee shrimps. So somewhere down the line one of your shrimp might have been mixed with Taiwan bees and is no longer PRL. It just tanks one shrimp to mess up the genes of a whole colony. 
    • sdlTBfanUK
      Sorry, missed this one somehow! The PRL look fantastic and the odd ones look part PRL and part Red wine/Red shadow in the colour. They are still very beautiful but ideally should be seperated to help keep the PRL clean if you can do that.  Nice clear photos!
×
×
  • Create New...